
Every time I fly through Reykjavík (okay, technically Keflavik, but you get the idea), I think of these two guys. Continue Reading Perestroika, Glasnost, and a Safer and Saner World
Insight and commentary on the 1965 Hague Service Convention (among other Hague Conventions) and how it works for litigators in the United States and Canada.

Every time I fly through Reykjavík (okay, technically Keflavik, but you get the idea), I think of these two guys. Continue Reading Perestroika, Glasnost, and a Safer and Saner World

From time to time, I catch myself ranting in this space. Not in this post, though. I had so many great conversations with clients today that my voice is hoarse. And there were so many recurring themes in those conversations that I suddenly feel the need to share my top tips for serving overseas defendants, and also to create sort of a digest of the best pieces of advice I can give a litigator who doesn’t want to screw things up. Continue Reading Seven Tips for Service Abroad

Several years ago, I posted my thoughts on the impracticality of litigators handling overseas service on their own. More recently, an interesting thought dawned on me. Frankly, it’s not very novel, so I couldn’t really call it an epiphany, but it’s an awfully important analysis to any trial lawyer who works on contingency. Continue Reading DIY service abroad? It’s costing more than you think.
Sorry, folks. Set aside thoughts of goulash, the Gabor Sisters, and nice chess games at a thermal bath… you’re litigating here, not sightseeing. But with a Hungarian defendant, the procedure before you really isn’t overly challenging. Service in Hungary is subject to the strictures of the Hague Service Convention. Continue Reading How to Serve Process in Hungary (updated 2025)
Another FAQ entry here, with a very simple response…
Since we’re serving this foreign defendant under Hague rules, do they get extra time to answer?
Nope. Continue Reading Extra time for the defendant? Not under the Hague Service Convention.

Author’s Note: This is far from a scholarly criticism– it is a nuts & bolts look at how this thing should go down. Preface:
Frankly, I think electronic service is the only way to get these scofflaws served.
Continue Reading Don’t know where your defendant is? You still have to *look* for them.

[Ten years ago, I had the great pleasure of visiting the Republic of Turkey on a CLE adventure. A dozen lawyers (some with their families!) had an amazing time hitting seven cities in ten days… and meeting some truly wonderful people. In a nod to that country’s wishes, I’ll spell it Türkiye* from here on out.]
Service of process in Türkiye is subject to the strictures of the Hague Service Convention. Continue Reading How to Serve Process in Turkey (Türkiye*)

For most of my childhood, Romania was one of those countries that adventurous travelers wanted to see… we just couldn’t go there because it was behind the Iron Curtain, a Soviet puppet state ruled by a ruthless dictator. That changed dramatically in December, 1989,* when the world got to watch that dictator, Nicolae Ceaușescu, removed from power and his Communist regime toppled. Three decades on, Romania is not only democratic, but a member of the European Union and NATO, literally the front line between the Ukrainian War and the west. I could go on, but this is about civil procedure, so… Continue Reading How to Serve Process in Romania

(TL;DR… publication is a horrible, terrible, woefully insufficient means of service, and the Supreme Court said so way back in 1950. It should only be used as a last resort, and even then, only when there’s a reasonable chance that it’ll actually notify anybody that a case is afoot.)
A story flooded my news feed last Friday… US Judge Orders a Mexican Drug Cartel to Pay $1.5 Billion to Victims’ Families. A default for a billion and a half bucks ($4.6B after it’s trebled) is almost real money in this day & age, so I got curious about the procedural posture of the case. Because I live in civ-pro, several questions popped into my head, first among them being “who got sued?” (with a bit of incredulity). Continue Reading Publication, 4(f)(3), and Mexican Cartels
As a general rule, I don’t talk to litigants. Even if their lawyer consents or hops on the call with us. Sure, the litigant is the guy paying my fee, but his lawyer is my client, and I’m not about to get in the middle of their relationship. Besides, it’s always a terrible idea to give a litigant control over something that is a lawyer’s ethical obligation. Continue Reading Run away when the litigant says this…